When it comes to the history of the 20th century, one event stands as a powerful symbol of the division between East and West: the Berlin Wall. Known as the Berlin wall, it was constructed in 1961 and split Berlin into 2 halves in real sense in because of the Cold War politics between the Soviet Union and United States. But how the world saw this giant construction and its contribution to the German capital? The article focuses on various attitudes toward the construction of the Berlin Wall and it is high time to look at them from various nesses.
The Wall’s Construction
Reaction to the building of the Berlin Wall was stunned, worried, and angered among the global population. Although people anticipated promoters of East Germany to fully discourage such activities, nobody expected such abruptness and brutality of construction of the wall. while western countries interpenetrate the Berlin wall as a symbol of oppression, and as a physical representation of the division of Europe.
The Western Perspective
In the context of descriptive Western analysis, specific thanks to history, the Berlin Wall was an obvious indicator of the oppressive communism. Ironically, the wall made split between family and friend as well as a city that had been whole for generations. It physically signified the restriction and limitation was under the Soviet control. Again, western media would give a representation of this wall as the symbol of communism’s inability to function and the oppression of the universal qualities of human rights.
The Impact on Westerners
To the Western standards the Berlin Wall symbolized the violations of individual liberties and people’s choice. It effected the people’s perception and politics as West the world came out in support of a united Germany and the demolition of the wall. Some of the well-known political polices include the one that was known to have been talked by the former head of state for the united state of America Ronald Reagan famously said; ‘Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.’
The Eastern Perspective
Across the Iron Curtain, the East European countries and the Soviet Union justified the building of the Wall as the protection of Germans from Western aggression. They said that it was desirable to avoid penetration into East Germany by capitalists and striving to destabilize the socialist model.
Securing Communist Ideals
The Eastern perspective depicted the wall as the barrier against the perceived vices of imperialism of the Western capitalist world. The East German government defending the building of wall arguing that it was meant to protect the socialist state and the achievement made so far in the construction of the state.
The Global Impact
The effects of Berlin Wall were severely enormous to the world in general. It raised the Cold War conflict between the USA and USSR with divided Berlin as a symbol of confrontations between Capitalism and communism for all sides involved.
Symbol of Division
The collapse of wall became symbolically and internationally known as the Berlin Wall. This symbolised war between communism and Capitalism, which was the defining theme in the second half of the twentieth century.
Civil Disobedience and Reconciliation
The broken Berlin Wall in 1989 symbolized new future, change in a positive direction toward non-violent conquest of unity. It marked the beginning of the end to the policy of apartheid and other social evils. That the wall burned was symbolically meaningful, but the fact that people were able to remove it calmly and without bloodshed echoed around the world and symbolised the human desire for freedom and unity.
Conclusion
The ideas about the Berlin Wall were subjective depending on perspective and location – whether East or West. Whereas for the West it had been a representation of suppression and demarcation, the Eastern Bloc accorded it the definition of a necessity that was defensive in nature. Finally, the destruction of the wall symbolized victory for the unity which proved that the spirit cannot be confined to the wall.
Leave a Reply